The Breitling Watch Source Forums

Hi
Do you think all is correct ?
Thank you for your help.
Boris61

Theres better people to tell you that it is real than me but your dates are way off its nearer 1970 ish as I have seen one in the breitling museam web site . http://www.breitling-museum.com/1970-1979.html .

Am on a phone so won't comment on originality but model is 2005, not year and the Breitling Museum site is completely unofficial and run by one of the biggest fake peddlers in the business. Many of the pieces are evidence of that.

Andy - breitling-museum.com has no connection to TheSage, run by some schmuck who "grabs pictures of watches he likes off ebay", no crook, just stupid.


the SuperOcean 2005 above seems to be a correct and well worn execution 2.

I Should have known better .

You're right, I've done that before - two domains that are too similar (and about as credible, just for different reasons).

Thank you for your quick answers.
When i bought this watch i like the "well worn "condition ( a Rolex collector would it call nicly faded or something else)
Would it make sense to give such a watch with patina to chronodeco or not and which influence has it on
the worth?
Boris61

Craig does not do dial relumes - and hands & dial need to have the same greenish lume on these.
see nothing he could do besides a very comptetent service here.

Thank you Fred.