|
Carl, I read your other post about your AD in Canda - sad. I think what you (we) are witnessing is merely the forces of economics at play. I would suggest that despite the crowd on this and other sites most purchasers of watches nowadays are likely more concerned with the name & the looks, not so much the mechanics of what's inside. Thus, the overlords at places like Swatch Corp are structuring their brand (Omega in this case) for maximum sales at a specific price band while continuing to build the brand's image in a way that supports this. So when you mention "All the effort seems to be the superficialities like aesthetics of the watch, the showcasing " I think you are right, but this is not by chance. One more thing I want to remind everyone on this forum which applies to all watch brands. A watch - say Breitling - costs $3,000-4,000 or more ONLY because WE are willing to pay that amount. It's not because the components are so well made, so well balanced and tuned, so innovative (eg silicone parts), or the craftsmen such masters that the individual watch costs so much, it's merely because there are enough consumers willing to pay that much. If enough consumers would pay $5,000 for the watch, that would be its cost. Omega has been working on raising its average price (across all products) according to their literature. They are doing this by marketing and focusing efforts on the things they think will get them there (and they have been successful according to their literature). Sadly for your AD and many watch lovers, it's the quality side of the equation that suffers.
_________________ Omega21
|