| The Breitling Watch Source Forums https://breitlingsource.com/phpBB2/ | |
| Greatest Breitling - Semi-finals https://breitlingsource.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=42734 | Page 1 of 3 | 
| Author: | Roffensian [ Sat Sep 22, 2012 6:42 am ] | 
| Post subject: | Greatest Breitling - Semi-finals | 
| Semi-finals will start later today, but before that gets going I wanted to check in with you guys on my thinking for the rest of the tournament. I'm thinking that the final four should end up being listed 1 through 4 so what I would do is: 1) Regular voting for the semi-finals - 1 week head to head 2) Have a final and a 3rd / 4th play off with the two semi-final winners in hte final and the two semi-final losers in the 3rd / 4th match up. I am also thinking that the 3rd / 4th match up could be a regular 1 week vote but that the final could be 2 weeks to give more time for votes. Not sure about that as voting does seem to tail off after the first few days. What do you guys think? | |
| Author: | Sooner [ Sat Sep 22, 2012 7:07 am ] | 
| Post subject: | Re: Greatest Breitling - Semi-finals | 
| Roffensian wrote: Have . . . the two semi-final losers in the 3rd / 4th match up. What do you guys think? A consolation game? I like it. | |
| Author: | Sooner [ Sat Sep 22, 2012 7:16 am ] | 
| Post subject: | Re: Greatest Breitling - Semi-finals | 
| I also think the final four should be seeded, with the two higher vote-getters from the last round pitted against the two lower vote-getters, in a 1 vs. 4 and 2 vs. 3 scenario. That would mean: 1) Chronomat 13352 (49 votes) vs. 4) Crosswind Special LE (36 votes) and 2) Navitimer 01 (44 votes) vs. 3) Navitimer 1461 LE (2011) 19370 (41 votes) | |
| Author: | sharkman [ Sat Sep 22, 2012 8:34 am ] | 
| Post subject: | Re: Greatest Breitling - Semi-finals | 
| Sooner wrote: I also think the final four should be seeded, with the two higher vote-getters from the last round pitted against the two lower vote-getters, in a 1 vs. 4 and 2 vs. 3 scenario. That would mean: 1) Chronomat 13352 (49 votes) vs. 4) Crosswind Special LE (36 votes) and 2) Navitimer 01 (44 votes) vs. 3) Navitimer 1461 LE (2011) 19370 (41 votes) I think that would be a good way to match it up, though it has been random draw throughout. But maybe a little tweaking at the final 4 stage is a good idea. Roff and the rest, what do you think? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk | |
| Author: | Roffensian [ Sat Sep 22, 2012 8:37 am ] | 
| Post subject: | Re: Greatest Breitling - Semi-finals | 
| sharkman wrote: Sooner wrote: I also think the final four should be seeded, with the two higher vote-getters from the last round pitted against the two lower vote-getters, in a 1 vs. 4 and 2 vs. 3 scenario. That would mean: 1) Chronomat 13352 (49 votes) vs. 4) Crosswind Special LE (36 votes) and 2) Navitimer 01 (44 votes) vs. 3) Navitimer 1461 LE (2011) 19370 (41 votes) I think that would be a good way to match it up, though it has been random draw throughout. But maybe a little tweaking at the final 4 stage is a good idea. Roff and the rest, what do you think? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk I'm not keen to be honest, simply because we had a community vote that ran for several days on the approach that should be taken and random won by a mile. I don't think that it's fair to change that at the last minute - although it's a fine idea for the 2013 version   | |
| Author: | sharkman [ Sat Sep 22, 2012 9:17 am ] | 
| Post subject: | Re: Greatest Breitling - Semi-finals | 
| That's what I thought. On with the game! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk | |
| Author: | Sooner [ Sat Sep 22, 2012 10:40 am ] | 
| Post subject: | Re: Greatest Breitling - Semi-finals | 
| Roffensian wrote: we had a community vote that ran for several days on the approach that should be taken and random won by a mile.  I don't think that it's fair to change that at the last minute - although it's a fine idea for the 2013 version    I voted for random too, but in hindsight I think seeding would have been a better way to go, for the same reason it makes sense in sports tournaments, and should be considered if this poll is done again next year. By the way, I wasn't suggesting seeding for the semi-finals to benefit a personal favorite. Since the 'Fish fell by the wayside, I don't have a horse in this race.   | |
| Author: | Driver8 [ Sat Sep 22, 2012 2:40 pm ] | 
| Post subject: | Re: Greatest Breitling - Semi-finals | 
| I say keep it random. It started random, so let's let it finish that way.   | |
| Author: | Roffensian [ Sat Sep 22, 2012 2:51 pm ] | 
| Post subject: | Re: Greatest Breitling - Semi-finals | 
| Semi-Finals are up: Crosswind Special LE vs. Navitimer 1461 LE Navitimer 01 vs. Chronomat 13352 viewforum.php?f=25 Still interested in thoughts on the length of time that the final should run for. | |
| Author: | sharkman [ Sat Sep 22, 2012 3:22 pm ] | 
| Post subject: | Re: Greatest Breitling - Semi-finals | 
| Roffensian wrote: Semi-Finals are up: Crosswind Special LE vs. Navitimer 1461 LE Navitimer 02 vs. Chronomat 13352 viewforum.php?f=25 Noooooooooo. Leave it up for 3 weeks because that is how long it will take for me to choose between the Chronomat 13352 and Navi 01. My worst possible choice. Edit - oh yeah, thanks for the effort again.  Edit again - to save myself the mental anguish  , I chose to vote for the one most likely to knock off the Navi 1461, which I reckon will see the final round. | |
| Author: | sharkman [ Sat Sep 22, 2012 3:32 pm ] | 
| Post subject: | Re: Greatest Breitling - Semi-finals | 
| Roffensian wrote: Semi-Finals are up: Still interested in thoughts on the length of time that the final should run for. A week - the voting peters out before a week is up - Maybe next Sunday instead of Saturday? And picture IDs for the final vote.   | |
| Author: | wessa [ Sat Sep 22, 2012 4:31 pm ] | 
| Post subject: | Re: Greatest Breitling - Semi-finals | 
| Oh man, choosing between the Navi 01 and 13352 is like trying to decide which arm to chop off, the left or the right one  Not that I own the 13352 but its darn close to the 13050s in my collection. Looks like it could be all Navis final, bit boring. | |
| Author: | sharkman [ Sat Sep 22, 2012 5:30 pm ] | 
| Post subject: | Re: Greatest Breitling - Semi-finals | 
| wessa wrote: Oh man, choosing between the Navi 01 and 13352 is like trying to decide which arm to chop off,  the left or the right one  Not that I own the 13352 but its darn close to the 13050s in my collection. Looks like it could be all Navis final, bit boring. I won't say how I voted but I am wearing the one I didn't vote for. Were I Jewish, I would be sitting shiva. [i think I am getting far too vested in this forum project  ] Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk | |
| Author: | wessa [ Sun Sep 23, 2012 12:01 am ] | 
| Post subject: | Re: Greatest Breitling - Semi-finals | 
| Done my voting but that was as pleasant as my visit to a dentist yesterday  It's not heading my way. | |
| Author: | bozman52 [ Sun Sep 23, 2012 9:34 am ] | 
| Post subject: | Re: Greatest Breitling - Semi-finals | 
| I find it odd that an LE of 250 Crosswind made it this far. Not exactly one of Breitling's better creations IMO. | |
| Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC - 8 hours | 
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ | |