The Breitling Watch Source Forums

Breitling Watch Information Forums, Navitimer, Chronomat
It is currently Thu Apr 18, 2024 3:25 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 2:20 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2012 7:47 am
Posts: 1264
Likes: 12 posts
Liked in: 71 posts
Location: UK
The display on my Aerospace was flashing for a bit this morning. It's stopped flashing and is normal now but I assume that's the first sign of a failing battery.

Case date-stamp = 2610 so manufactured c.June 2010. Bought from AD Jan 2013. Red battery replacement sticker said Sep 2012.

I therefore assume that the battery was replaced pre-sale, as it's 3 yrs from sale but 6 yrs from manufacture.

Should I therefore send it off for an 'Overhaul' service rather than a 'Maintenance' service, since it's already had one battery change and is coming up to 6 yrs old? Or should I just post it off to BUK and let them decide?!

Thanks for any advice.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 3:38 am 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 11:39 am
Posts: 12837
Likes: 148 posts
Liked in: 519 posts
Location: UK
Personally I'd be tempted to give BUK a call first. They're very helpful and they may have a record of it being in before (assuming it did indeed have a battery change in 2012, and that the change was done at Breitling of course). They will be able to advise on the best course of action.

_________________
Driver8

Site Moderator
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 3:51 am 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:09 am
Posts: 36521
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 489 posts
Location: Ontario, Canada
My understanding of the sticker is that it's a 'change the battery at this time if the watch hasn't been sold' indicator, not evidence the battery was ever changed. Either way, I would let BUK make the call about why it needs rather than potentially pay more than you need to.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 5:12 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 11:05 am
Posts: 12682
Likes: 185 posts
Liked in: 72 posts
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Roffensian wrote:
My understanding of the sticker is that it's a 'change the battery at this time if the watch hasn't been sold' indicator

+1


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 2:21 pm 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 11:39 am
Posts: 12837
Likes: 148 posts
Liked in: 519 posts
Location: UK
Roffensian wrote:
My understanding of the sticker is that it's a 'change the battery at this time if the watch hasn't been sold' indicator, not evidence the battery was ever changed.

Having never owned a quartz Breitling I must confess I didn't know that.

_________________
Driver8

Site Moderator
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 2:42 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2012 7:47 am
Posts: 1264
Likes: 12 posts
Liked in: 71 posts
Location: UK
I agree that it's exactly that - a scheduled battery-change sticker. (In my case I assume that it was changed, not because of the sticker, but because it wouldn't have lasted six years.)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 3:28 pm 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:09 am
Posts: 36521
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 489 posts
Location: Ontario, Canada
TomP wrote:
I agree that it's exactly that - a scheduled battery-change sticker. (In my case I assume that it was changed, not because of the sticker, but because it wouldn't have lasted six years.)

That assumption further assumes that it didn't spend a significant portion of those six years with the crown pulled out in a showcase / vault, which may be a dangerous assumption.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2016 2:34 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2012 7:47 am
Posts: 1264
Likes: 12 posts
Liked in: 71 posts
Location: UK
Roffensian wrote:
TomP wrote:
I agree that it's exactly that - a scheduled battery-change sticker. (In my case I assume that it was changed, not because of the sticker, but because it wouldn't have lasted six years.)

That assumption further assumes that it didn't spend a significant portion of those six years with the crown pulled out in a showcase / vault, which may be a dangerous assumption.


Yes good point Roff. Anyway I'll send it off and let them decide as advised. Thanks all.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 28 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
 




Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group