The Breitling Watch Source Forums

Breitling Watch Information Forums, Navitimer, Chronomat
It is currently Fri May 24, 2024 2:52 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 4:41 pm 
Offline
King of Ling
King of Ling
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 12:59 pm
Posts: 2469
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
http://cgi.ebay.com/VINTAGE-BREITLING-C ... 3efa8f0a91

Caliber 112??

Never heard of it... if someone could enlighten me that would be great...

_________________
"I don't got the bright watch I got the right watch" -Jay Z


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 5:21 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 6:43 pm
Posts: 3329
Likes: 117 posts
Liked in: 414 posts
Put together watch. Should be a Cal 12 with the gilded movement. Notice the date is sideways which is another indicator that the movement came from a 'normal' configuration Cal 12. The Pult cases are commonly found on ebay nos so it's a simple matter to find a donor watch like a Gruen, Bulova, Kelek, etc, that came with the same basic movement and reengineer it into a different case. They always forget about the date wheel though. :P


Last edited by vintage on Mon Nov 30, 2009 5:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 5:26 pm 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:09 am
Posts: 36521
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 489 posts
Location: Ontario, Canada
I'm not so sure Paul.........

If you read the movement not as 112 but as 11-2 then the movement makes sense. 11-2 was the fast beat (3Hz) caliber 11 and the only visual difference between that and the 12 was the nickel plating finish vs. the gilded movement. I'm not familiar with the 2117, but...... http://www.breitling.org.il/site/detail ... D7%9D+2117

I can't read the serial number, but if it's 1970 / early 71 then the 11-2 could be a correct movement.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 5:36 pm 
Offline
King of Ling
King of Ling
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 12:59 pm
Posts: 2469
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
But the movement reads as a "112" there's no dash... and that stamping looks a bit odd... but that's an interesting bit about the 11-2 movement... didn't know such a movement existed...

_________________
"I don't got the bright watch I got the right watch" -Jay Z


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 5:41 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 6:43 pm
Posts: 3329
Likes: 117 posts
Liked in: 414 posts
Roffensian wrote:
I'm not so sure Paul.........

If you read the movement not as 112 but as 11-2 then the movement makes sense. 11-2 was the fast beat (3Hz) caliber 11 and the only visual difference between that and the 12 was the nickel plating finish vs. the gilded movement. I'm not familiar with the 2117, but...... http://www.breitling.org.il/site/detail ... D7%9D+2117

I can't read the serial number, but if it's 1970 / early 71 then the 11-2 could be a correct movement.


A credible example now Roff. Scan down at this link.

http://people.timezone.com/breitling/bfaq/Vintage_Collection.html

The gilded movement Cal 12 was the fast version of the Cal 11. Never heard of a Cal 112 before. Plus the fact it says that in the machined slot would also give me pause. I also don't think Breitling would have used light blue hands on a blue dial either. The date wheel sideways is always a good indicator though.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:46 am 
Offline
Breitling Fanatic
Breitling Fanatic

Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 12:32 am
Posts: 375
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Quote:
I'm not so sure Paul.........

If you read the movement not as 112 but as 11-2 then the movement makes sense. 11-2 was the fast beat (3Hz) caliber 11 and the only visual difference between that and the 12 was the nickel plating finish vs. the gilded movement.


Quote:
But the movement reads as a "112" there's no dash... and that stamping looks a bit odd... but that's an interesting bit about the 11-2 movement


The calibre 11-2 exist, and its ok with no dash between 11 and 2, but i never saw one with gilded bridge.

But the watch is a complete mariage as Paul said. The Pult was first time created in 1971, but the calibre 11-2 was used only middle of 1969 not 1971 as Roff said, at the end of 1969 Breitling used only the calibre 12. And the date is rotated by 90 degrees.

For completly information about the calibre 11, 11-, 12, 14, 15, please read more here: http://breitling.lu/index.php?page=Thread&threadID=29


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 5:14 am 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:09 am
Posts: 36521
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 489 posts
Location: Ontario, Canada
vintage wrote:
Roffensian wrote:
I'm not so sure Paul.........

If you read the movement not as 112 but as 11-2 then the movement makes sense. 11-2 was the fast beat (3Hz) caliber 11 and the only visual difference between that and the 12 was the nickel plating finish vs. the gilded movement. I'm not familiar with the 2117, but...... http://www.breitling.org.il/site/detail ... D7%9D+2117

I can't read the serial number, but if it's 1970 / early 71 then the 11-2 could be a correct movement.


A credible example now Roff. Scan down at this link.

http://people.timezone.com/breitling/bfaq/Vintage_Collection.html

The gilded movement Cal 12 was the fast version of the Cal 11. Never heard of a Cal 112 before. Plus the fact it says that in the machined slot would also give me pause. I also don't think Breitling would have used light blue hands on a blue dial either. The date wheel sideways is always a good indicator though.


I'm not sure on the machined bridge either - definitely cause for question - and the TZ link seals it for me that you are correct.

The 11-2 is correctly portrayed as 112 (though that doesn't make it right), Jean-Michel has a good summary in the Chrono-matic section of www.navitimer.net


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
 




Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group