The Breitling Watch Source Forums https://breitlingsource.com/phpBB2/ |
|
Bentley banato 42 pic https://breitlingsource.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=39229 |
Page 2 of 2 |
Author: | RJRJRJ [ Fri Apr 20, 2012 2:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bentley banato 42 pic |
jnelson3097 wrote: Is it just me, or does the date window look weird? It just looks out of proportion or something or too close to the center of the dial. I see what youre saying, but its only when I focus directly on the date. Taking the entire dial into focus though, I think it fits in rather seamlessly. Its the "too close together" subdials that I dont like. |
Author: | sharkman [ Fri Apr 20, 2012 10:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | Bentley banato 42 pic |
I want to like it....but just can't. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Author: | Nav01L [ Sat Apr 21, 2012 1:13 am ] |
Post subject: | Bentley banato 42 pic |
Two lumed subdial hands and one that isn't, a tad unbalanced perhaps? The thing is that at that price point, I can still not look at these watches with a straight face. Merchandising is fine but at close to five figures I'd take any given Omega over that one... or a Navi... or another Pam for that matter. It is not an ugly watch, but to me it doesn't reflect the value of the asking price. In my wish list, that's a key factor though, so sorry Breitling, not for me. Why don't you let Chopard mess with Bentley and get back to making Breitlings? |
Author: | swiss1 [ Sat Apr 21, 2012 2:00 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bentley banato 42 pic |
Love the strap. I still prefer the earlier Bentley Le Mans. |
Author: | F14D_Tomcat [ Sat Apr 21, 2012 3:11 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bentley banato 42 pic |
sharkman wrote: I want to like it....but just can't. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2 |
Author: | JacksonStone [ Sat Apr 21, 2012 10:45 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bentley banato 42 pic |
Nav01L wrote: Two lumed subdial hands and one that isn't, a tad unbalanced perhaps? I hadn't noticed that, but I agree, it does look a bit unbalanced. Perhaps the rationale is that the lumed hands are on the chronograph totalizers, whereas the non-lumed hand is for the small seconds. Which brings up a pet peeve I have with most chronographs with a 3,6,9 layout: why don't they put the seconds at 6, and balance the totalizers at 3 and 9? It makes the layout so much more symmetrical. I'm glad Rolex finally did this with the Daytona.Nav01L wrote: The thing is that at that price point, I can still not look at these watches with a straight face. Merchandising is fine but at close to five figures I'd take any given Omega over that one... or a Navi... or another Pam for that matter. Another good point. It does seem ironic that Breitling's most expensive lineup isn't even in-house. Doubly ironic, at least for me (and I would guess a number of others), is that I'm being asked to pay a premium for a brand association with a car I will likely never be able to afford.
|
Page 2 of 2 | All times are UTC - 8 hours |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |